Am 16.03.2024 um 20:31:33 Uhr schrieb Slavko via mailop: > Dňa 16. marca 2024 19:19:21 UTC používateľ John Levine via mailop > <mailop@mailop.org> napísal: > > >The DKIM RFC very clearly says that an invalid DKIM signature is > >equivalent to no signature. I suppose there may be people who wrongly > >misinterpret an invalid signature as saying something bad about the > >message, but there's not much we can do about people who don't bother > >to read the spec. > > And the same RCF clearly suggests to leave other (even invalid) > signatures untouched. > > But who will follow 13 years old standard... ;-)
When Google and Co. make DKIM mandatory, this will be hard, because those messages are likely to be rejected. -- kind regards Marco Send spam to 1710617493mu...@cartoonies.org _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
