You just regard all email which passes DMARC as trusted, as if the mail was
S/MIME signed by the sender personally.The sender has chosen to trust that
shared provider. Its not "your problem" as a receiver if that mail is
fraudulent.If you act on a fraudulent email, sent by a fraudster via a shared
host which does not employ user separation, you simply act as the email was
genuine, and charge the claimed sender of any mishaps that arise out of the
email.After all, sender is in a position to choose a provider that does employ
user separation, but did not, eiter intentionally or by negligect. Sender bears
ALL responsibility.Best regards Sebastian Nielsen
-------- Originalmeddelande --------Från: Slavko via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
Datum: 2024-02-11 22:19 (GMT+01:00) Till: 'Mailing List' <mailop@mailop.org>
Ämne: Re: [mailop] Is forwarding to Gmail basically dead? Dňa 11. februára 2024
19:06:31 UTC používateľ Sebastian Nielsen via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
napísal:>>>On my site, users can use only own address/aliases, but i can use
any (including any domain)...>>Of course since you are administrator. Nothing
strange with that.It was not meant as self-presentation, but as particular
examplethat one site can have multiple different rules.>It all about trust.
Choose providers you trust.But i asked as receiver how to verify, not as domain
owner. Asreceiver i cannot choose from which provider message arrives,but i
have to decide if i will accept it or not. The DMARC (etc)is tool to help me to
choose properly/better, but in case ofshared site its success can be as useful
as dice roll...Anyway, what is trusted for domain owner not necessarymust be
trusted for receiver too and vice versa...regards--
Slavkohttps://www.slavino.sk/_______________________________________________mailop
mailing listmailop@mailop.orghttps://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
