On 2024-02-08, Archange via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
[...]
No, I agree with you (I’m running two forwarders that have no issues so
far). And having a DMARC enforcing policy without DKIM is a bad idea.
I would have wished that DMARC would require both SPF and DKIM, but now
it is too late for that. Hopefully they are not a lot of domain that do
DMARC without DKIM.
On 08.02.24 10:24, Julian Bradfield via mailop wrote:
But if DMARC required alignment on both SPF and DKIM, forwarding would
break, wouldn't it?
Correct, and this would make DKIM useless.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"One World. One Web. One Program." - Microsoft promotional advertisement
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer!" - Adolf Hitler
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
