It appears that Tobias Fiebig via mailop <[email protected]> said: >Does anyone know if this just slipped off the table somewhere, or if >there was consensus to just skip on the servicetype given it is just >'SHOULD be present' 'MAY ignore' in the RFC (given the observable >number of users of TLS-RPT so far, calling it "consensus" might be a >stretch, though ;-))?
In retrospect the service tag was a mistake. It's not widely implemented, so if you use anything other than s=email you will lose mail because recipient systems will get confused. The MTAs that receive mta-sts messages generally have no idea there is supposed to be something special about those messags. As I recall the original idea was that there might be DKIM signatures on things that are nothing like e-mail messsages, perhaps VoIP SIP headers. But the only thing that uses DKIM is email and that's the only service. R's, John _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
