It would be nice if Gmail App (Android, iOS), as well as Gmail Webmail would identify themselves by sending ID: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2971

I have noticed that Gmail is not doing that. Also Samsung Mail App is not doing that, and a few minor MUAs.


On 2020-07-23 21:01, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
I'd say one of the largest clients is actually iOS Mail, which probably has a significant usage even for the major webmail services with their own clients.  Given the way that iOS is usually set up, and (at least until recently) how a third party mail app couldn't be used everywhere iOS Mail was, there are even a lot of folks who have it configured even if they mostly use another app.

The other large set is going to be Outlook either connected to Exchange or O365, but that's not going to be IMAP.  Apple Mail is also a decent percentage, that would be IMAP.

Thunderbird has some decent usage for us.  mutt/pine/etc are in the noise.

Brandon

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 8:14 AM Marcel Becker via mailop <mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:

    One data point I look at is Litmus' annual state of email report,
    which among other things lists the top email apps they see through
    their tools.

    The two key points are usually:

    1: The majority of mail is consumed on phones
    2: A very, very large junk of mail is consumed through IMAP
    clients. That includes apps like Gmail or Yahoo Mail on phones
    which are not necessarily used to access Gmail or Yahoo but other
    email services.

    That matches our own data as well.


    On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
    <mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:


        Does anyone have (a pointer to) figures for the comparative use
        of "traditional" MUAs (IMAP, POP) and webmail - both generic
        and email-service-supplied ?

        When I first heard about BIMI I assumed it was aimed at
        email-service-supplied webmail - I imagine mutt or alpine users
        would be turned *off* by sender logos.

        The latest BIMI discussion prompted me to ask whether POP/IMAP
        MUAs have any significance in email today.

        Even Thunderbird, which I guess is one of the biggest MUAs left,
        if not the biggest, has been moved from the Mozilla Corporation
        to the Mozilla Foundation
        https://blog.thunderbird.net/2020/01/thunderbirds-new-home/
        <https://blog.thunderbird.net/2020/01/thunderbirds-new-home/>
        suggesting that it is "good to have" rather than "profitable".

        Thanks,

-- Andrew C. Aitchison  Kendal, UK
        and...@aitchison.me.uk <mailto:and...@aitchison.me.uk>

        _______________________________________________
        mailop mailing list
        mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
        https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
        <https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop>

    _______________________________________________
    mailop mailing list
    mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
    https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
    <https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop>


_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to