One data point I look at is Litmus' annual state of email report, which among other things lists the top email apps they see through their tools.
The two key points are usually: 1: The majority of mail is consumed on phones 2: A very, very large junk of mail is consumed through IMAP clients. That includes apps like Gmail or Yahoo Mail on phones which are not necessarily used to access Gmail or Yahoo but other email services. That matches our own data as well. On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrew C Aitchison via mailop < mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > Does anyone have (a pointer to) figures for the comparative use > of "traditional" MUAs (IMAP, POP) and webmail - both generic > and email-service-supplied ? > > When I first heard about BIMI I assumed it was aimed at > email-service-supplied webmail - I imagine mutt or alpine users > would be turned *off* by sender logos. > > The latest BIMI discussion prompted me to ask whether POP/IMAP > MUAs have any significance in email today. > > Even Thunderbird, which I guess is one of the biggest MUAs left, > if not the biggest, has been moved from the Mozilla Corporation > to the Mozilla Foundation > https://blog.thunderbird.net/2020/01/thunderbirds-new-home/ > suggesting that it is "good to have" rather than "profitable". > > Thanks, > > -- > Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK > and...@aitchison.me.uk > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
