On 7/27/2020 9:49 AM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
Is it possible that a complaint that a postmaster's note about what
he thinks his users like can't be trusted because it lacks a
scientifically rigorous study might possibly be off topic for an
operational considerations list? Asking for a friend.
Well, ummm... It wouldn't surprise me to find that the entire thread
was off topic, given that the opening note contained:
On 7/22/2020 5:49 AM, Sidsel Jensen via mailop wrote:
I read today at
https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/g-suite/gsuite-security-updates-for-gmail-meet-chat-and-admin -
that Google/Gmail is starting a BIMI pilot.
I hope Google will share the results of the pilot - perhaps at the next
M3AAWG?
Which, arguably, isn't all that different in kind from the query I made
today.
The meta-challenge is that while this is an ops list, comments that
might be taken as 'marketing' of a new capability pretty much beg for
queries about the basis for its benefits.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
