This is wonderful. Thanks for the reply.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020, 6:55 PM Matt Palmer via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 06:06:25PM -0700, Luke wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 07:48:45AM -0700, Luke via mailop wrote: > > > > I cant tell if this the thing about ESPs not removing bounces is a > joke > > > or > > > > not. All of the major ESPs have logic for adding bad addresses to > > > > suppression lists. > > > > > > [Citation needed] > > > > > > Your assertion does not match my data. > > [snip URLs] > > OK, I walked into that one. > > > To be honest, I'm not proud of myself for dignifying this nonsense with a > > response. I think you should be ashamed of yourself for *pretending* you > > don't know that ESPs suppress invalid email addresses. > > I'm not pretending anything. I'm extrapolating from data. You're... I > don't even know. > > > You need to take a deep breath, chill, and reevaluate your approach to > > defending the world from spam. This is not productive. In fact, it's > almost > > like you're gaslighting ESPs and the people who work for them. > > There's definitely some gaslighting going on here, but it's not what you > seem to think it is. When I see a never-ending stream of 554 responses in > my logs to delivery attempts from Mailchimp IP addresses, to an e-mail > address that was only provided to one organisation (and that organisation > was not, I might add, Mailchimp), and then get told "Mailchimp suppresses > invalid email addresses"... that's gaslighting right there. You are > denying the existence of the evidence sitting right in front of me. > > > Pretty remarkable stuff actually. I hope you come around. > > Right back atcha, champ. > > - Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
