On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 06:06:25PM -0700, Luke wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 07:48:45AM -0700, Luke via mailop wrote: > > > I cant tell if this the thing about ESPs not removing bounces is a joke > > or > > > not. All of the major ESPs have logic for adding bad addresses to > > > suppression lists. > > > > [Citation needed] > > > > Your assertion does not match my data.
[snip URLs] OK, I walked into that one. > To be honest, I'm not proud of myself for dignifying this nonsense with a > response. I think you should be ashamed of yourself for *pretending* you > don't know that ESPs suppress invalid email addresses. I'm not pretending anything. I'm extrapolating from data. You're... I don't even know. > You need to take a deep breath, chill, and reevaluate your approach to > defending the world from spam. This is not productive. In fact, it's almost > like you're gaslighting ESPs and the people who work for them. There's definitely some gaslighting going on here, but it's not what you seem to think it is. When I see a never-ending stream of 554 responses in my logs to delivery attempts from Mailchimp IP addresses, to an e-mail address that was only provided to one organisation (and that organisation was not, I might add, Mailchimp), and then get told "Mailchimp suppresses invalid email addresses"... that's gaslighting right there. You are denying the existence of the evidence sitting right in front of me. > Pretty remarkable stuff actually. I hope you come around. Right back atcha, champ. - Matt _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
