Hi Al,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 09:29:32AM -0500, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
> You're new to a very old problem.
Yes it seems I am, as I've had a misunderstanding about SpamCop for
a really long time.
> I could probably find blog posts I wrote in 2003 complaining about
> how Spamcop chooses to block reports to some platforms or networks
> and how it's confusing to the end user because it looks like the
> provider is rejecting them, which is not true.
I think that is the worst problem here because I have certainly made
value judgements about sending networks based on my mistaken
understanding of what it means for there not to be a valid reporting
address in SpamCop.
> You'll never get anywhere trying to argue the case pro or con;
> just do what you think is best and know that the rest of the world
> will also do the same.
As the issue is new to me, I feel like I had to see what others'
views were on this, and have stated mine. But yeah I'm not going to
labour the points.
So, where else can one go to streamline the spam reporting process?
This page lists only SpamCop and Abusix:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_reporting
As far as I can see Abusix in this context is only an
IP-to-abuse-contact lookup tool.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
