On 6/26/19 9:15 AM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
Once again, with free services, sometimes you get what you pay for.
I don't see what the price of the Freenet email service has to do with anything.
Each and every single organization has the freedom to run their email infrastructure however they want.
The organization in this context /seems/ /to/ /have/ [1] a local policy that requires email purportedly from their users to their users to go through their MSA and reject such email at their MTA.
That seems perfectly reasonable to me.I see no problem at all with any organization making that same policy. So, what does the price of the service from said organization have to do with this?
[1] I don't know if Freenet has any such policy or not. I'm suggesting that they might based on what little I've seen. Such a policy would explain the symptoms being discussed.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
