On 6/26/19 6:52 AM, Tobias Matthaeus via mailop wrote:
Hello everybody,
Hi,
The following scenario:A Freenet user writes an e-mail from bspw us...@freenet.de to us...@externedomain.de The e-mail address us...@externedomain.de is again hosted on my mail server and is provided with redirections. One of the redirects is for example us...@freenet.deThe e-mail from us...@freenet.de to us...@externedomain.de is now bounced on delivery to us...@freenet.de with the note:
It sounds like user1@freenet sends an email to user2@externedomain whom has their email configured to forward to user3@freenet.
Assuming that you aren't doing anything like SRS, Freenet will see an email coming into them from user1@freenet going to user3@freenet.
SRS would change that scenario so that Freenet would see an email coming into them from <something>@externedomain to user3@freenet.
relay=emig.freenet.de <http://emig.freenet.de>[195.4.92.216]:25, delay=1.3, delays=0.94/0.19/0.16/0.03, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host emig.freenet.de <http://emig.freenet.de>[195.4.92.216] said: 587 Please use submission (587) for local to local mail. (in reply to MAIL FROM command))
It looks like Freenet has instituted a policy that all email to @freenet email addresses purportedly from @freenet must go through their MSA and reject any such email that doesn't go through the MSA.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
