> On Apr 21, 2018, at 10:24, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > > In article <a234556d-6b7f-220b-7825-2133f6734...@thedave.ca> you write: >> Am I missing a case where there is a negative outcome to a legitimate, >> by-the-book sender? > > Spammer forges header with address of unrelated network, that network > gets listed even though it has never sent spam and has no relation to > the spammer.m
So don’t do that? I was specifically talking about querying a DNSBL with possible-forged IP addresses, not creating new listings or anything else. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
