-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 12:02 -0500, frnk...@iname.com wrote: > Same here -- many of my customers, for example those who go to O365, > aren't > aware of the implications when they add Microsoft's suggested SPF > record, > and then wonder why some emails (originated from a non-O365 system) > aren't > being received. Fortunately our helpdesk is very attuned to these > issues > and can suggest tweaks to their SPF record to resolve the issue.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn789058(v=exchg.150).aspx MS apparently thinks the SPF failures caused by forwarding are less important than the human failures caused by receiving forged mail. The cynic might think their commercial interests are advanced by such forwarding failures, adding pressure to move more clients into O365. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREKAAYFAlkh2QsACgkQL6j7milTFsFSYQCggtHJLIXl2FctBztbWSReX3qd hmQAniDUE1Vti5NYIU5ItBHFnlZlcZqq =vpEF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
