You're the one who said "CloudFlare will serve your website's static pages from our cache...that falls into my definition of being a host, even if it's only short term". So will your browser. /nitpick
Anyways, I thought there was a court case back in mid-90s where Compuserve or Prodigy or something was ruled to not be responsible for content flowing through their networks as they are simply the conduit. Wouldn't that apply to something like CloudFlare? -A On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Dave Warren <da...@hireahit.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016, at 21:44, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Dave Warren <da...@hireahit.com> wrote: > > They > can yell and scream all they want about not being a host, but they also > advertise that "CloudFlare will serve your website's static pages from > our cache" when your origin server isn't reachable, that falls into my > definition of being a host, even if only a short term. > > > Does that definition of 'being a host' extend to your Chrome, Firefox, and > IE cache as well? > > > If my Firefox cache is serving the content to third parties on behalf of > the owner of the site hosting the content, yes. Mine is not configured to > do so, and I can suspect any reasonable person would know that, so this > seems to be a particularly stupid question. > > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
