My bad, I should have included this issue has spanned well over multiple days so the 24 hours rule wasn't a cause.
I queued a few different customers I know with valid DMARC records and I'm seeing the “\” in front of the “;”’s. I will however dig into the greylisting. As always, thank you all for looking into this and helping out! Thanks, [image: Dyn logo, Dyn.com] <http://dyn.com/> <http://twitter.com/dyn> <http://twitter.com/dyninc>[image: Dyn facebook account] <http://facebook.com/dyn> <http://twitter.com/dyninc>[image: Dyn LinkedIn account] <http://linkedin.com/company/dyn> Dickie LaFlamme / Deliverability Specialist +1 603-296-1952 On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > I see it slightly differently: > > > > $ host -t txt _dmarc.chinalovecupid.com > > _dmarc.chinalovecupid.com descriptive text "v=DMARC1\; p=none\; > rua=mailto:dm...@chinalovecupid.com"; > > > > What’s with the “\” in front of the “;”’s? > > > > Aloha, > > Michael. > > -- > > *Michael J Wise* | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has > Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool > <http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ? > > > > *From:* Dickie LaFlamme [mailto:rlafla...@dyn.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 6:02 PM > *To:* Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > *Cc:* mailop@mailop.org > *Subject:* Re: [mailop] DMARC record in p=none not receiving aggregate > reports to RUA > > > > ha, no worries. That's fair enough. Here's the customers DMARC record. > > The domain > > : > > chinalovecupid.com > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fchinalovecupid.com&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=hyC4gIkrzZR%2fDciqYLZ9KKBH3Cn5dzc312xNuzjA%2bFw%3d> > > v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dm...@chinalovecupid.com > > > > Again we know that this does not currently have the "pct=100" tag, but > with or without the results have been the same. > > > > > Thanks, > > [image: Image removed by sender. Dyn logo, Dyn.com] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdyn.com%2f&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=snizrDv1dW5hmDG2c9T0AFXFSYYwshvzaTPVGR0n%2fQk%3d> > [image: Image removed by sender.] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=3EQ%2fAJ8dZSiczQ99YMEiW%2bMlIfg0hmjFI5gqYrLqkzU%3d> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyninc&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=gd8AkMpjOzvm5fw5NQtPSjuOBLoaIQ5oJQ5HScljMdw%3d>[image: > Image removed by sender. Dyn facebook account] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffacebook.com%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=fZ3itHieFSAy2R0ac4ZmmKaj0aC9tkgy0EmdDdWsZeU%3d> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyninc&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=gd8AkMpjOzvm5fw5NQtPSjuOBLoaIQ5oJQ5HScljMdw%3d>[image: > Image removed by sender. Dyn LinkedIn account] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2flinkedin.com%2fcompany%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=%2fZMbTTscSw7Vrb7kDqCgNmr2V1FkMmESxbmFKoiuHhg%3d> > > Dickie LaFlamme / Deliverability Specialist > [image: Image removed by sender.] +1 603-296-1952 > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > > … as always, please let us know the customer’s real domain name (or IP > address, or whatever) when making these requests. > > > > Not including that is about on par with the legendary complaints of: > > > > “ It Doesn’t Work. > > “ I Can’t Print. > > Etc, > > > > At some point, we’re going to ask you for it anyway, so best to just > provide it at the start. > > > > Aloha, > > Michael. > > -- > > *Michael J Wise* | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has > Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fen-us%2fdownload%2fdetails.aspx%3fid%3d18275&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=FlP3r9KMf2HXfwj7n2SWZiwigROZBT2qGf4Tugx2Uds%3d> > ? > > > > *From:* mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] *On Behalf Of *Dickie > LaFlamme > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:28 PM > *To:* mailop@mailop.org > *Subject:* [mailop] DMARC record in p=none not receiving aggregate > reports to RUA > > > > We have a customer who's setup a DMARC record with the correct TXT record; > v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@"customerspostmaster"; after > waiting the 24 hour period we still did not receive any aggregate reports > to the mailbox. After some searching we advised the customer to try and > take out "PCT" as that could possibly have been triggering something to not > work correctly (shot in the dark try). > > > > Then after that attempt and no result I did some more research and found > that in some instances reports can be huge and up to 10MB and denied by > their internal servers. We then advised the customer to check their logs to > make sure mail wasn't getting denied at their gateway. To no avail reports > still are not being sent. > > > > Has anyone else run into this problem with customers when they're trying > to receive aggregate reporting using a rua that is in house? If so I'd love > to hear any troubleshooting you've tried as well as possible fixes for > this. > > > > Thanks, > > Dickie LaFlamme > > > > >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
