Are you taking that approach because the workaround is less than ideal?  
Otherwise the current “workaround” could be the new standard.
 

Frank

 

From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Vick Khera
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:54 PM
To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
Subject: Re: [mailop] Yahoo DMARC changes

 

 

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Steve Atkins <st...@blighty.com 
<mailto:st...@blighty.com> > wrote:

So if you've been doing anything special with forwarders or mailing lists for 
yahoo.com <http://yahoo.com> 

 

it's probably a good idea to do it for their other domains too in the next few 
days.

 

When Y! first set up p=reject on their main domain, we built our system's 
evasive maneuvers to work around it to be domain independent. Our systems do a 
DNS lookup for the DMARC record and if they find p=reject or p=quarantine and 
we do not sign using their From address in the domain, we automatically enable 
the workarounds to avoid falling in the trap. No manual configuration necessary.

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to