Are you taking that approach because the workaround is less than ideal? Otherwise the current “workaround” could be the new standard.
Frank From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Vick Khera Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:54 PM To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> Subject: Re: [mailop] Yahoo DMARC changes On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Steve Atkins <st...@blighty.com <mailto:st...@blighty.com> > wrote: So if you've been doing anything special with forwarders or mailing lists for yahoo.com <http://yahoo.com> it's probably a good idea to do it for their other domains too in the next few days. When Y! first set up p=reject on their main domain, we built our system's evasive maneuvers to work around it to be domain independent. Our systems do a DNS lookup for the DMARC record and if they find p=reject or p=quarantine and we do not sign using their From address in the domain, we automatically enable the workarounds to avoid falling in the trap. No manual configuration necessary.
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop