On 6/10/25 09:40, Dan Caballero wrote:
I've done some testing and this is close to what we need. However, I seem to be having an issue with the option for "Explicit Reply-to set; no Cc added". The messages are still including a Cc field with the sender's email. Is there another setting that affects the Cc field?
The difference between "Explicit Reply-to header set" and "Explicit Reply-to set; no Cc added" only affects lists with Personalize = Full. For those cases, the To: in delivered posts is replaced with the recipient's address which means in some cases, the list's posting address is not exposed so we put it in Cc: unless Reply goes to list is "Explicit Reply-to set; no Cc added". This setting is intended for announce type lists where members normally do not post to the list.
If DMARC mitigations are applied and Reply goes to list is anything other than No Munging, the original From: will always be added to Cc:. There is no setting to avoid this. This is so reply-all will include the original sender.
-- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message/HI35BTQD6H6IZHHCYPGDWLOZDBXAYTB2/ This message sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
