> But I am confused as to your goal. Previously when the list was > anonymous, all replies went to the list. Maybe your goal is to have list > replies be addressed to <list-n...@caltech.edu> rather than Last Name, > First Name via list-name <list-n...@caltech.edu>. If that is the goal, > you could try setting Reply goes to list setting to Reply goes to list. > That will set a Reply-To: list's short description > <list-n...@caltech.edu>. That may be what you want as long as the > responder's MUA honors Reply-To: over From: > -- > Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Thanks. I had forgot to mention that we did also configure the DMARC mitigation to show the sender's email. You're correct about us looking to set the "reply-to" to the list address instead of the sender. I've done some testing and this is close to what we need. However, I seem to be having an issue with the option for "Explicit Reply-to set; no Cc added". The messages are still including a Cc field with the sender's email. Is there another setting that affects the Cc field? Thanks again. _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message/EUPZCQBXDY7CMNY4WJWRAJP5MDBAQUFU/ This message sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
