If you poke through the history on this thread you can find some of my previous background on captchas but I can give you a short summary of their purpose here. Basically companies need a way to figure out if you a person or a computer to ensure you're not some bad actor trying to create a bunch of bogus accounts for spamming and the like. This is usually done via a puzzle that is 'easy' for people and 'hard' for computers to solve. There are two flaws with this. One is that as the algorithms have become more sophisticated the definition of 'easy' has moved to 'hard' while only becoming 'harder' for algorithms. This is an arms race and eventually the puzzles will become too difficult and/or the algorithms will have too high a success rate to make it useful anymore. We're starting to reach that point. The second flaw is that you can hire a mechanical turk service that will farm out whatever tasks you need done to real people for little money. So the accessible captcha plugins/services do this for a legitimate reason but that also means bad actors can do the same thing. In other words, any captcha solution that costs more than a few cents won't be worth it since the bad guys can just hire real people to solve them, especially if they protect valuable content/data. I've actually evaluated a number of captcha solutions and so far none have worked any better than the garbled audio or swirly images. Either the puzzle was too hard for people or it was easy for the algorithm/script. I can elaborate more but suffice it to say, this is a tough nut to crack.

CB

On 12/1/12 10:01 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
Adrienne,

I could not have said things better myself.

I'm sure many disagree with us, but it's nice to know I'm not the only one who feels this way.

have a great day.

Thank you kindly,

Christopher-Mark Gilland.
Founder of CLG Productions
----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrienne Sinclair Chalmers" <chalmer...@googlemail.com>
To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 5:35 PM
Subject: captcha solving service for the mac.


Hi guys

Isn't the real question here not about whether captcha solving services should be free, but why people are allowed to use inaccessible captchas on their sites in the first place? Personally, I am sick of the rotten things and don't know how people get away with using them and their unintelligible so-called audio equivalents.

Perhaps if the cost of captcha solving fell on the heads of those who included these barriers to accessibility and not to people who can't see or hear them, they would pretty soon find other solutions that everyone could use on an equal basis.

I have never had the "need" to use captchas sufficiently explained to me. There always seem to be other ways of achieving whatever result the proprietor of the site thinks captchas supply.

Regards

Adrienne


--
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to