no. the only version coded for the mac is express. that's how it's been for a 
while now.

it would be handy if there was a pro version for mac offering a few extra bells 
and whistles, etc but hey, that's how it is.

lew

On 3 Apr 2012, at 10:27, Gigi wrote:

> Isn't there a pro version for Abby fine reader question
> Regards
> Gigi
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:26 AM, Scott Howell <scottn3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I've been using ABBYY FineReader Express and find it meets most all of my 
>> needs.
>> 
>> On Apr 2, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Jim Gatteys wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all!
>>> Has anybody used Abby fine reader express for the mac?  I just downloaded a 
>>> trial version and it was much better than a few years ago.  It worked with 
>>> my old epson perfection scanner and I was able to scan and edit a document. 
>>>  I guess it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of kurzweil but for 
>>> basic stuff it seemed fine.  I am seriously considering a purchase of fine 
>>> reader.
>>> Jim
>>> 
>>> On Apr 2, 2012, at 8:21 PM, David Tanner wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It is alive and well...  Do you have version 12 patch 4?  That is the 
>>>> latest release and there is some support for at least one digital camera 
>>>> in that patch upgrade.
>>>> 
>>>> As far as Kurzweil 1000 on the Mac; the news isn't good.  There is 
>>>> Kurzweil3000 for the Mac, but the folks at Cambian Learning don't think 
>>>> they can make enough profit on us blind folks so they say they will not 
>>>> release a version for Apple because if every blind person baught a copy of 
>>>> Kurzweil1000 for Mac they still couldn't make enough profit to make it 
>>>> worth it for them to do that.
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brent Harding" <br...@hostany.net>
>>>> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 8:04 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: A Question Regarding OCR
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Any hope for those of us Kurzweil users? I could live with my old Epson 
>>>>> Perfection scanner, but the new HP all in one takes forever. It's true 
>>>>> that it's quieter by a lot, but it's probably 30 to 45 seconds on the 
>>>>> scanning phase. I hate the mail now more than I ever did, but I don't 
>>>>> have the space nor USB ports for both devices on the desk. If I ever went 
>>>>> back to college, I'd seriously look into a sighted person over what I 
>>>>> have now.
>>>>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to