> I agree on that. I've heard and made somepretty bad sounding cds and don't 
> even get me started on transcoding! Ok I'll shut up now!
On Nov 18, 2010, at 10:06, Scott Granados <scott.grana...@gmail.com> wrote:

> CD disks do not necessarily sound better than downloads.
> 
> It depends on how much compression is used and I'm highly skeptical as to 
> what the human ear can detect anyway.
> 
> I see value in the digital verses analog discussion but not in one digital 
> verses another.  The ear is not nearly as good and the brain is even stranger 
> when it comes to audio signal processing.
> 
> The whole CD thing is over stated.  Remember that the sample rate of a 
> standard CD is only 44.1 khz meaning that you fall way in to the audio range 
> and you don't nearly have enough samples per wave.  If you like listening to 
> sawtooth waves that's fine but for musicality not so good.  You're way in to 
> the audio range when you get to that 10 points per wave point and I'm not 
> convinced that's even enough to accurately represent an analog wave.  The 
> newer higher sample rate recording methods, even with compression in my ear 
> sound better than old slow bit rate CD but thqt's me.
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 17, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Sarah Alawami wrote:
> 
>> lol. Yeah youare one of the very few throw backs. Hehahaha! Just giviing you 
>> a hard time because I can.
>> anyways 99 C is plenty for a track in my opinion and hte quality is just 
>> fabulious on a regular system.
>> 
>> Take care.
>> 
>> S
>> 
>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 20:26, Michael Thurman <kb7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I thought that i tunes let you download as many times as you want once you 
>>> pay for a track... my annoyance is I tunes doesn't have a refresh my 
>>> library option so if you have paid for tracks it remembers and replaces 
>>> them if you loose them I shouldn't have to keep track of every track i ave 
>>> purchased in order to get them back. I also think that 99c a track is still 
>>> too much, no cheaper to buy an album worth of tracks and I don't even get a 
>>> disc. real cds still sound better than downloads a home,  of course i still 
>>> enjoy my vinyl collection as well so I'm a throwback
>>> of course i still have a 2 channel pioneer system sitting here in front of 
>>> me  pioneer amp bose  2.1 bookshelf speakers, technics turntable ect lol :)
>>> 
>>> On Nov 15, 2010, at 1:32 AM, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Ricardo,
>>>> 
>>>> for me its the quality of the compression from the download that is the 
>>>> issue that keeps me buying CD's.
>>>> 
>>>> When I can get a download at a higher rate, up in the 700kbps range I'll 
>>>> be happier, and one that let's me download the item within reason as many 
>>>> times as I like, unlike Apple.
>>>> 
>>>> At this time most downloads are 320kbps or less, often less, and yet I rip 
>>>> in double this.
>>>> 
>>>> can I hear the difference, not always, but often yes, granted not on my 
>>>> iPhone headset, but on a good quality home entertainment system, or 
>>>> keeping with the spirit of the conversation of cars, in the back of my 
>>>> Merc S Classs yes, it certainly is notable.
>>>> 
>>>> Its essential that the download providers get their act together and up 
>>>> the quality of the download, and allow me to download my collection say at 
>>>> least twice a year or so in case I accidently delete something.
>>>> 
>>>> once I can do this I'll switch to downloads only.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 14 Nov 2010, at 07:57, Ricardo Walker wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Its all ready changing.  People aren't buying CDs anymore.  I dare you to 
>>>> find a record store.  lol.  15 years ago, they were everywhere.  The 
>>>> majority of people download music.  By next year, music albums downloaded, 
>>>> will pass albums sold in stores.  the change is coming.  People will cling 
>>>> to the CD like they clung to the cassette tape.  But once people stop 
>>>> building the hardware to play them, people will have no choice but to move 
>>>> on.
>>>> 
>>>> Ricardo Walker
>>>> rwalker...@gmail.com
>>>> Twitter, Skype, and AIM: rwalker296
>>>> Google Voice: 1-646-450-2197
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 13, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Chenelle Hancock wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> hi, heather, eric, sara and everyone on the list
>>>>> I have to say that for over eighteen years or so i have been using cd's  
>>>>> as my mode of music choice. however, it has only been the past eight 
>>>>> months or so that i have getting my music through  itunes and 
>>>>> transferring my music library of over 500  cd's to my computer. i still 
>>>>> have them all though. due to the fact i still infer that  technology can 
>>>>> crash at anytime and you have to have a back up to your back up. if you 
>>>>> know what i mean.  also i  have relatives  who are still in the age of 
>>>>> the stereo  system/ cd player age. so when we have party's we often  use 
>>>>> someof my cd's to listen to etc...
>>>>> i don't think that cd's will go out of date as fast as tape did back in 
>>>>> the late to mid eighty's and early nineties.  despite the fact that i 
>>>>> have saved some of my music to my external hard drive i have not stored 
>>>>> all of it as of yet. but i do plann on doing so. 
>>>>> chenelle
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macv

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to