Maybe we are all thinking a bit too old school.  Two weeks ago Humanware 
demonstrated document readers to me which used a camera instead.  The camera 
was portable as it was on a fold up tripod type thing.  The software was on a 
Windows machine which drove the camera, words were also displayed on screen as 
the document was read out.  The camera took  a picture of the document and a 
second or so later the document was read out to me.  You could take pictures of 
multiple pages too.  tHe speech quality was amazing, even better then Alex I 
have to be honest. I thought hmmmm I would buy this if I could use it on my Mac 
too.  I wish Humanware would develop software for the Mac to drive hardware 
like this.

I decided on the iPal Solo so I did not have to use a windows machine to read 
documents, as the iPal solo works completely without a computer.  

Who knows in about 2 years time we will all probably be reading printed 
material via the camera on the iPhone 6 or whatever. I can just picture a nifty 
stand you slide your iPhone or iPod Touch into to neatly take a picture of the 
document below.  I want it now!!!

On 18 Jun 2010, at 16:43, Mary Otten wrote:

> Hi allison,
> While I have not used abbyy for the Mac, based on what I've heard people say, 
> no, it is nowhere near like K1000, which I have used for probably a decade. 
> Yes, you can hook up a usb scanner, and if you get one that FR recognized, 
> such as the hp 8300 pro or epson 200 or 300, I forget the full model 
> designation, you can apparently scan directly without the need for a second 
> app to do the scanning part and then transferring the file to abby for 
> processing. But, as I understand it, you cannot scan and read simultaneously; 
> you can't scan multiple pages into the same file. You can't scan and 
> immediately read to check out setting accuracy. You have to let abbyy save 
> the page to a file and then read it there. Lots more steps. Maybe ok for the 
> occasional page. but totally not so for serious scanning. If my understanding 
> of the limitation of fr express is incorrect, I hope somebody will correct 
> me. I asked a guy I know who uses FR with the hp8300 and who has used k1000 
> if fr express could do the things I outlined above and he flatly said no. to 
> be sure, there is a huge cost difference. But having an excellent efficient 
> scanning solution is one reason I have no intention of giving up Windows for 
> now. Using two applications where one will do, having to  save to a file 
> prior to reading and not being able have multiple pages in the same file, 
> have it open and reading while I'm scanning, or even scanning one thing and 
> reading another are all reasons why I can't see dumping windows for 
> scanning/ocr purposes.  If abbyy would come out with a full version of fine 
> reader, that might be a different story.
> 
> mary
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to