That would be great, we'll have to wait and see what microsoft does.  I think I 
might stick to iWork myself, as well.
Olivia
On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:37 AM, marie Howarth wrote:

> Well, this article may release some new light on the office on the mac 
> situation for us all. It is not in black and white yet but this article 
> suggests that office may just be written in Coco. Outlook will be coming to 
> the office suite and it will be written in coco. I am hoping the rest of the 
> apps will be also written in the language our beloved voice over recognises. 
> It's not concrete but later this year we may have access to the office suite 
> that is so essential to the business world.
> http://www.tgdaily.com/services/48387-microsoft-touts-office-2011-for-mac-os-x
> On 21 Apr 2010, at 14:13, Kaare Dehard wrote:
> 
>> It comes down to what I've said choose the tools. Ms spreadsheet access is 
>> still better, and we can harrang apple in a kindly way til this changes, but 
>> I'm greedy, and do have bootcamp installed for these eventualities. 
>> It really is about chosing toools that fit the task even if in general 
>> terms, I don't like the manufactures of the tool.
>> On 2010-04-21, at 4:38 AM, Dónal Fitzpatrick wrote:
>> 
>>> good morning Denise,
>>> 
>>> I would agree with the others who have replied to this thread stating that 
>>> the Mac can be used as a productivity tool.  I am a University professor 
>>> (in the American sense of that word rather than the Uk/Irish meaning) which 
>>> means I must use my mac to write papers, grade student exams and to carry 
>>> out other functions.  However, I have not totally abandoned my Dell.  While 
>>> the word processor in iWork 09 is accessible, I don't like either the 
>>> Numbers spreadsheet application or indeed the access provided by VO.  It's 
>>> just an opinion, and no doubt the zealots on this list will vehemently 
>>> disagree, but I still believe that the browsing of spreadsheets using Jaws 
>>> is unparallelled.  Vo lacks the kinds of semantic access to this kind of 
>>> data that Jaws/Excel provide.  
>>> 
>>> I would particularly agree with the comment which said "preview" is a 
>>> lovely PDF reader, however it has given me problems when used in 
>>> full-screen mode.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> Dónal
>>> On 21 Apr 2010, at 01:23, denise avant wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Yes. Particularly since I am a lawyer with the public defenders office. And
>>>> my primary role as an appellate and post-conviction attorney is to write
>>>> briefs, with case citations.
>>>> 
>>>> I knew about the fusion program, as I have spent time talking to others
>>>> about the program. I didn't know about the snap shot.
>>>> 
>>>> So thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John J Herzog
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 7:14 PM
>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: Re: the apple user?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hello, 
>>>> 
>>>> As a macbook user, who has to write substantial papers for law school, and
>>>> who has used his computer at a summer internship with Pepsico, I feel I can
>>>> helpfully answer your questions. 
>>>> 
>>>> Forgive the length of this email. 
>>>> 
>>>> First, the idea that macs are only play toys is complete and utter 
>>>> nonsense.
>>>> On my mac, I do use the apps like Itunes and Ichat, but I use serious apps
>>>> as well. Iwork is quite accessible, as is text edit, allowing you to do
>>>> extensive formatting of documents. Also, the preview application on the mac
>>>> is one of the best PDF readers I have ever seen. The text is readable with
>>>> voiceover, and there are few, if any crashes. What other screen readers can
>>>> you say that about? 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Next, I will address your concern about microsoft office applications not
>>>> being accessible. It is true that they do not work with voiceover. However,
>>>> for about seventy dollars, you can pick up a program called VMware fusion.
>>>> Fusion allows you to install windows and run it at the same time as your
>>>> mac. This means that you can use whatever screen reader you like for 
>>>> windows
>>>> and run office without a hitch. 
>>>> 
>>>> There is one more upside to running fusion on mac. After you have 
>>>> configured
>>>> windows just the way you want it, you can create what is known as a
>>>> snapshot. The snapshot will restore your system to its exact configuration
>>>> at the time you took it, meaning you will always have a fresh install of
>>>> windows, office, and your screen reader a click away. It's awesome, because
>>>> it does a complete and utter system restore when windows decides to go 
>>>> south
>>>> on you. For a blind person, I actually think a mac with fusion is better
>>>> than a standard windows PC for this reason. Note that a fusion snapshot
>>>> literally restores all files and settings to the way they were when you 
>>>> took
>>>> it. It is much more extensive than using the built in windows system 
>>>> restore
>>>> utility. It has saved my skin a number of times, and I will give you a
>>>> perfect example. 
>>>> 
>>>> At the beginning of law school, I found it necessary to purchase a scanner
>>>> with a document feeder. Previously, I had a different scanner that I was
>>>> using with kurzweil 1000. Now, when I installed the twain drivers for the
>>>> new scanner, after trying to unsuccessfully remove the old drivers, I found
>>>> myself in a situation where neither set worked. If I had a standard windows
>>>> machine, I was facing the real possibility of having to reinstall windows 
>>>> to
>>>> get either unit to work reliably. Either that, or it was having to spend
>>>> hours and hours messing with system dll files, and we all know what happens
>>>> after that. 
>>>> 
>>>> So, instead, I just restored a snapshot I made of my XP machine prior to
>>>> having installed either Kurzweil or the scanner software. I then installed
>>>> both on what was essentially a fresh copy of windows, and all was smooth
>>>> sailing from there. It saved me from endless headaches, plus the burden of
>>>> having to get a sighted person to help install the screen reader again, and
>>>> the time that would have been wasted in such a pursuit. 
>>>> 
>>>> I hope this helps answer your questions. 
>>>> 
>>>> John 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> P.S. If you go to www.blindcooltech.com, you can find some excellent demos
>>>> of the macintosh by Mike Arigo. He even shows how fusion and voiceover 
>>>> work,
>>>> and he runs window eyes on the XP side of things. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hope this helps. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 20, 2010, at 7:52 PM, denise avant wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hello all,
>>>> 
>>>> Please forgive the length of this message.
>>>> 
>>>> In researching the issue of whether to purchase an apple mac or not, I've
>>>> come across a few people who have expressed criticism if not concern about
>>>> the mac computers themselves. I own the iphone, and have enjoyed it
>>>> tremendously. I've been able to do things with the phone I was never able 
>>>> to
>>>> do with other phones. The only problem I still have is putting in 
>>>> extensions
>>>> and account numbers once the number is connected.
>>>> 
>>>> But having said this, I seriously doubt whether I will ever buy another
>>>> phone, where I don't have accessibility built in.
>>>> 
>>>> There is an applestoe here in Chicago, and when I've had any problem of any
>>>> kind, the sales staff has been very easy to deal with.
>>>> 
>>>> Even when I call on the telephone, I find a very friendly staff.
>>>> 
>>>> I have my own personal sales representative since I have mac book pro on 
>>>> the
>>>> drawing board.
>>>> 
>>>> What I enjoy most of all, is that I can go to an appelstore, and with the
>>>> exception of a couple of products, there is accessibility right out of the
>>>> box, with no extra costs or smas to worry about.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm seeking opinions from those of you who use these computers with voice
>>>> over. The biggest criticism I've heard that if you're conducting a business
>>>> or doing a serious project, the mac is not for the blind user. This
>>>> apparently has to do with the fact that the office aps are not accessible
>>>> with vo, and iwork9 acts strangely sometimes.
>>>> 
>>>> Basically, one person, who doesn't use the mac, but is familiar with the
>>>> product line, told me that the operating system was those who wanted to
>>>> "play."
>>>> 
>>>> Can those you have used the macbooks or other appel operating systems
>>>> address these issues. Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
>>>> database 5045 (20100420) __________
>>>> 
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email
>>>> tomacvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
>>>> database 5045 (20100420) __________
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to