Actually if that solution was incorporated into Uber practices, I dare say
we would not be having this exchange.
If the nfb effort you referenced did not lead to a way for customers to
inform Uber drivers when requesting transport that they are traveling
either with a cane or service animal, something incorporated into the
standard business practice of Uber world wide so that no one is ever
denied travel, what benefit did the
settlement actually have at all?
To be sure, the driver could just drive on by.
Kare
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021, dan d. wrote:
Unless of course the uber driver sees your dog and somehow just cann't find you
as he drives on by.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021, Jonathan C. Cohn wrote:
Well, we are getting a little off the Acple topic here. In the United States,
the ada requires these services to accept service dogs. the nfb successfully
enforced this with a settlement that requires drivers to be removed if they
refuse to provide tranportation to
you likeand your guide.
--
XR
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
list.
If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you
feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or
moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.
Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor. You can reach mark at:
mk...@ucla.edu and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at
caraqu...@caraquinn.com
The archives for this list can be searched at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/macvisionaries/alpine.OSX.2.23.453.2102281435230.25875%40dans-mac-mini-2.home.
