Nope, and I'm not personally convinced that Mozilla really cares. There was a blog post a while back from Mozilla essentially saying it was Apple's responsibility. Since then there've been a few vague sort of promises that we'll get Mac accessibility to Firefox but nothing actually has been done to make it happen. I stopped holding my breath a long time ago when it comes to Firefox, and I don't personally find Firevox to be as reliable a solution as properly implemented accessibility support would be. It suffices for browsing simple pages, but not much else and provides no access to the rest of the Firefox interface. Mozilla needs to get accessibility support into XUL and Gecko both. It's not a quick job, but I would've thought we'd have seen at least a little bit of something by now if they intended to do it in the near future.
On Jan 12, 10:17 am, Chris Hofstader <c...@hofstader.com> wrote: > Has any Firefox worked on Mac without FireVox installed? > On Jan 12, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Chris Blouch wrote: > > > > > Save yourself some time in case you were hoping for more in the new > > release. All I could access was the window title and close/min/max buttons > > in the chrome. > > > CB > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "MacVisionaries" group. > > To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
