Right, but at best you still have the contextual phonetic issues of 
which witch is which. Also, a keyboard won't require training to figure 
out what letters you meant. The new automated closed caption system from 
Google is going to be interesting as they refine the algorithims:

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/automatic-captions-in-youtube.html

I went to their announcement in Washington and they showed automated 
captions generated on a video talking inserting a SIMM card into mobile 
phone got captioned as Salmon card. But even so, for the blind community 
going from zero to something is a huge leap forward. That same untrained 
speech recognition, knowing Google, should start percolating into other 
places. At least it sounds like they are putting some solid R&D into it. 
Google naturally speaking anyone?

CB

Chris Hofstader wrote:
> Actually, the latest and greatest voice recognition systems are amazingly 
> accurate after they have been adequately trained.  "Adequate" training does 
> thak hundreds of hours of use and being incredibly faithful to correcting the 
> mistakes the software makes.  Few people who can type are willing to go 
> through this arduous process.
>
> I think something like keyboards will, for long form writing, be around for a 
> long time but I could see the next generation of smart phones having adequate 
> dictation software installed for text messages and other short bits of 
> communication that doesn't really require seriously formal writing and a few 
> mistakes doesn't really matter.
>
> Voice recognition without training, however, is another holy grail that the 
> serious research types need to solve.
>
> cdh 
> On Dec 4, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Chris Blouch wrote:
>
>   
>> I dunno. As long as the primary form of stored and forwarded 
>> communication is written text, the fastest way to generate that text is 
>> either going to be strong native speech recognition or a physical 
>> interface that makes use of all 10 fingers, if possible. Even though 
>> voice recognition keeps progressing it still has the same limitations of 
>> any conversation: it breaks down in noisy environments, others can 
>> overhear it, accents and local dialects make it hard to comprehend and 
>> there is only one channel so it's hard for a device to always correctly 
>> separate data from commands. For these reasons I think keyboards of some 
>> form will be with us for a long long time. That and they are mainstream. 
>> Any sighted user can find letters on the keyboard and peck out some text 
>> without training. Speech recognition probably won't be mainstream for 
>> some time because of the aforementioned flaws along with the usual 
>> technical issues of high-overhead in software/hardware to make it work.
>>
>> CB
>>
>> Mark BurningHawk Baxter wrote:
>>     
>>> The keyboard will become obsolete in the next 10-20 years; this is a  
>>> prediction I'm making now.  It was invented in the 19th century for  
>>> the manual typewriter.  It's going to go the way of the cathode ray  
>>> tube; it's primitive. Blind people either adapt or they get left  
>>> behind.  I can't afford an Iphone and it frustrates me to no end  
>>> because one of my close friends (Hi, Cara!) has shown me its use over  
>>> Skype, and it's the most revolutionary thing I've seen come out  
>>> since ... talking computers? :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark BurningHawk Baxter
>>>
>>> Skype and Twitter:  BurningHawk1969
>>> MSN:  burninghawk1...@hotmail.com
>>> My home page:
>>> http://MarkBurningHawk.net/
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>     
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
>   

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.


Reply via email to