And that is why I'm very supportive of what APple has done and will continue to 
do and I hope they do just that.
On Nov 30, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Richie Gardenhire wrote:

> And for this reason, I feel that many state agencies, (Alaska's, being  
> one of them)will be cutting back services, in favor of other things  
> and as Mark so eloquently pointed out, the elderly, the poor, and the  
> disabled, will be hurt first.  I know thisis a different subject line  
> from what was originally intended, and I apologize for that, but I  
> will say one more thing on this, and that is that I'm in favor of  
> universal design so that blind people can walk into any store and  
> purchase off-the-shelf software and get it working and we not be  
> forced to be co-dependent on state agencies to purchase our stuff.  I  
> guess, in a way, I'm against state agencies for the reasons I stated  
> above.  Richie Gardenhire, Anchorage, Alaska.
> 
> 
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:32 AM, carlene knight wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark:
> 
> I certainly don't hold a grudge as everybody is entitled to their  
> opinion.  However, if it weren't for the Commission for the blind here  
> in Oregon, there is no way that I could perform the job I was hired  
> for.  I had to have a programmer write JAWS scripts so that I could  
> get to the buttons, read the drop down boxes that just had graphics  
> for names, etc. I couldn't have afforded the thousands of dollars that  
> has costed.  He is working as we speak since the company I work for  
> has changed software and everything we had done in the past regarding  
> the original software is now null and void.  I could have not afforded  
> a Braille display at about 12,000 dollars.  I can say with certainty  
> that there are few if any companies that would provide any of these  
> services.  Unfortunately many government funded agencies, including  
> the Oregon Commission for the blind  do know little about Mac  
> accessibility as they have contracts with certain vendors, and, face  
> it,whether we  like it or not, a majority of companies still use  
> Windows based software.  My husband and I both decided on our own to  
> try the Mac, and though I've had some problems, I'm glad I did.  I've  
> learned it without an instructor.  We nearly lost our Commission last  
> summer so when I hear people talking about how we shouldn't have  
> government agencies such as this, I have to disagree though they do  
> have their problems.  Yes, some people do rely on others to much, but  
> not all of us do.  Like you, I grew up in the public school system in  
> a rural area.  I was born blind also.  I'll get off my soap box now.
> 
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Mark BurningHawk Baxter wrote:
> 
>> You, and I to a lesser extent, and others are the exception.  I was
>> born blind, didn't go to any institutions for the blind, was raised as
>> an only child, mostly in rural Vermont with minimal help from state
>> agencies.  Graduated from Dartmouth when I was 20, again with minimal
>> if any help from agencies--didn't have my first experience with any
>> agencies or institutions for the blind until I was 24, when the
>> Carroll Center was offering a medical transcription course and I
>> needed another, safer place to be.  They kicked me out of their dorm,
>> making me homeless, after six weeks there.  Rehab flatly refused to
>> support me and my music career in any way, and pressured me to go to
>> the Carroll Center in the first place, then pressured me to get
>> therapy and reform my ways when they made me homeless.  I only started
>> cautiously learning how to deal with the agencies in 2007, when it
>> became clear that my failing hearing was going to force me out of the
>> transcription career I'd had for 13+ years.  I learned Jaws and
>> Windows essentially by myself, as I've always been good with tech.
>> Even now, while I may have learned a little about how to get along
>> with the agencies and get what I need, it's a very uneasy truce at
>> best./  I hope to be starting a job at another institution for the
>> blind soon, but this time as a trainer, not a student, which hopefully
>> will turn out better.  You can see why I advocate for the abolition of
>> such systems.  They do not foster independence of thinking, and tend
>> to punish outside-the-box people, in my experience.  I do realize that
>> people blinded later in life may not adapt as fully as those born
>> blind; I'm learning that as I lose my hearing, so I have the privilege
>> of seeing both sides of the coin, but think about what that implies--
>> that the pressure on those whose world has already been blasted by
>> losing their sight will essentially become putty in the hands of high-
>> pressure agencies who are set in their ways.  The system seems to
>> punish at both ends--if you're too independent, you're pressured to
>> conform; if you're new to blindness, you're taught not to think for
>> yourself.  Hell, I didn't even do mobility orienting stuff until last
>> year, when Rehab here in CA suggested I ry it, and I decided, in the
>> interests of keeping the peace, what the heck; my mobility teacher
>> quickly realized that there was very little, beyond the immediate
>> rehearsing of directions, that she could improve upon what I and my
>> dog were already going.  Since I got Trekker, that's even more so; now
>> that Trekker is temporarily broken, I truly feel the loss. :)  I don't
>> see how the agencies really have done me any good, other than in the
>> purely material realm, and if I weren't as articulate as I am about
>> stating my needs, and as forceful as I am about what I need, which
>> most people are not, even that gain might be minimal, and even now the
>> damage is significant.  So, that's where my beef with the system(s)
>> comes in; sorry if that makes it a personal grudge, but there you are
>> then.
>> 
>> 
>> Mark BurningHawk Baxter
>> 
>> Skype and Twitter:  BurningHawk1969
>> MSN:  burninghawk1...@hotmail.com
>> My home page:
>> http://MarkBurningHawk.net/
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
>> .
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
> .
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.


Reply via email to