I suppose next, you're going to tell us how to get a copy of jaws totally
for free illegally! Oh, come on! It won't hurt to steel from the company!
Rauight! Smirk?
Never mind my major! sarcasm.
Chris.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shaf" <shafpa...@gmail.com>
To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: Downloading from Apple Music library
+1.
I've tried cracking the DRM with stuff like Sound Taxi with no luck.
They've apparently modified/strengthened the DRM protection which sucks,
but somebody will come up with a workaround soon.
95% of my offline music collection is in FLAC. I cannot comprehend
depending on streaming services to deliver my music. £10 per month is
ridiculous - and I don't own a local, non-protected copy of any of my
tracks while I am subscribed.
Streaming music appeals to many because they think they're getting a
good deal and don't have to torrent stuff all the time. Same thing with
Netflix. If people are happy with that then it's really their choice,
but why wouldn't you want to own a local copy of material? What if the
internet dies, you're capped, you have a slow connection etc?
Finally, if I want to support an artist I'll make an effort to meet them
and find alternative ways of donating to them, rather than purchasing
from a company who takes a 30% cut of the funds. That is just wrong, and
same goes for developers who make incredible apps and are forced to
upload their apps in the app store. Apple don't deserve 30% of a cut.
Not even payment gateways take that much.
-Shaf
On 7/3/2015 2:24 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
DRM is evil. Apple DRM is no exception, even if they’ve probably invented
the least annoying kind of DRM there is, it’s still DRM and it still
restricts you, all in the name of artificial market differentiation.
Which is wrong, and evil.
As to Apple Music, I can see myself using it for discovery, but I’ll never
allow my library to become tainted with the content. It’s just too great
a risk, for me and I think for others; if streaming becomes popular and
therefore exclusive, music ownership will be lost forever. Also, it’s
fairly well known that streaming and rentals don’t help artists nearly as
much as purchases, because there’s fierce competition on the margins and
of course the listening tastes of listeners are not nearly as uniform as
one might hope for the artists.
So, yes, very awesome, but let’s not forget what this is about: you’re
paying for a closed service that will end when you stop paying for it.
Online or offline, indistinguishable from the real thing or not, the
service is either a way for you to stay locked in, or a way for you to
purchase songs. And it’s all thanks to DRM. I’d have hoped for a
thousand other different models that reconciled reality with market
desires, perhaps involving lossless formats or automatic purchases of
offline downloads, but there it is. Please don’t fall into the trap of
thinking you own anything you listen to on Apple Music.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
