I don't want this to go too wildly off topic for this list, as it has
nothing to do with accessibility, but I do think it is an interesting
and somewhat important topic. I'll just note that what the article
fails to consider is that, by allowing third-party devices to continue
to sync via iTunes, Apple is opening itself up to a whole host of tech
support query issues. Users will request help for syncing non-
supported devices, in many cases lying about what device they are
using to get tech support, and cost APple valuable time and resources
on wild goose chases. Regardless of how anyone feels about other
aspects, the decision is an understandable and logical one. I do
understand the arguments against it as well, but the picture is not as
black as Palm wants to portray it.
Josh de Lioncourt
…my other mail provider is an owl…
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Lioncourt
Music: http://stage19music.com
Mac-cessibility: http://www.Lioncourt.com
Blog: http://lioncourtsmusings.blogspot.com
GoodReads: http://goodreads.com/Lioncourt
On Jul 17, 2009, at 2:03 PM, James & Nash wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> From the BBC website:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8155795.stm
>
> Take care
>
> james
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
