> On Sep 28, 2024, at 8:47 PM, Gagan Sidhu via macports-dev
> <macports-dev@lists.macports.org> wrote:
>
> in my opinion, and while it’s clear the lack of weak references and thread
> local storage in 10.6 is a disadvantage,
weak references and thread_local (emulated_tls, just like gcc does) work 100%
just fine on 10.5 and 10.6, and have done so for years now
> we’re sitting on a gold mine and it’s like such a shock we’re letting those
> BREWsers (brew losers) just take our spot.
>
> something must be done about this. they are losers. yes i did just “ad
> hominem” them (i bet they like richard dawkins too, like real losers do)
I don't know what you are referring to.
You can build almost any software you want, right now, on 10.5 and 10.6 using
the current libcxx port on those systems, and the system lib++ on 10.7 up.
And for systems where the installed libc++ is too old (usually requiring
filesystem, which came in with 10.15) we boot them up to use macports-libcxx
quite successfully.
I appreciate your enthusiasm. I think you need to spend quite a bit more time
understanding how things work in MacPorts now, as what you are proposing
actually offers nothing we don't already have.
Ken
