> On 22 Dec 2022, at 4:29 pm, Chris Jones <jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > >>> On 22 Dec 2022, at 1:28 pm, mcalh...@macports.org wrote: >>> >> >> Please forgive me if I am misunderstanding your question. >> As Ken pointed out, the rust-bootstrap binaries are generated just fine. >> I suppose it might be possible to include https://packages.macports.org/ in >> the `master_sites` of the Rust port. >> I am afraid I would have to thing about that a little. > > My question is simply I am not getting what the reason is why you cannot make > rust depend on rust-bootstrap when it needs to, on older systems, as a > standard port dependency. Does *all* older systems have to use the binaries > built on 10.9, or can rust-bootstrap be built fine as a port in 10.8, 10.7 > etc. as well ? > > Even if the answer to that last question is yes, only the 10.9 binaries can > be used, I still feel like something custom could be done to allow the use of > the standard binary tarball port distribution, so yes packages.macports.org, > to distribute the 10.9 binaries of rust-bootstrap to all builds that need it. > Basically, I see no need to use any other binary distribution infrastructure > than the one we are already using for the regular binary tarballs.
Just looking at https://packages.macports.org/rust-bootstrap/ Any idea why the binaries for 10.9 (darwin13) do not seem to be available there ? Chris > > Cheers Chris > >> >> -Marcus >> >>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 2:30 AM, Chris Jones <jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>> On 22 Dec 2022, at 4:02 am, mcalh...@macports.org wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>> As many of you know, the Rust compiler is self-hosting, so Rust is >>>> required to build Rust. >>>> The problem is that the Rust binaries provided by upstream only work on >>>> macOS 10.9 and above. >>>> >>>> To get around this, there is a rust-bootstrap port that build Rust >>>> binaries on 10.9+ intended to build Rust on previous macOS version. >>>> Currently, these binaries are stored on using my personal GitHub account. >>>> >>>> So the entire upgrade process is essentially: >>>> 1) Update the version in rust-bootstrap. >>>> 2) Build Rust binaries on a 10.9 VM. >>>> 3) Upload Rust binaries to GitHub account. >>>> 4) On older machines, use MacPorts Rust binaries to build Rust. >>>> On newer machines, us the upstream provides binaries to build Rust. >>>> >>>> This is far from ideal, but it has allowed us to get Rust working back to >>>> 10.5 (both i386 and x86_64). >>>> >>>> This entire procedure may be modified, and there are a few suggestions on >>>> the mailing list >>>> (https://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2022-December/thread.html#44855). >>>> >>>> However, until consensus is reached about major changes, it would be nice >>>> to make some incremental improvements. >>>> >>>> The easiest change: does anyone know of a better place to store the >>>> MacPorts generated binaries? >>>> >>>> More challenging: can anyone think of a way to automate the process of >>>> building the MacPorts Rust binaries after rust-bootstrap is update? >>> >>> I am sure I am missing something but if the bootstrap binaries are >>> generated via a port, rust-bootstrap, why cannot the usual mechanism for >>> distributing the port as a binary not be used ? >>> >>> Chris >>> >>>> >>>> -Marcus >>
