On 13 Jul 2017, at 21:50, db <iams...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 Jul 2017, at 18:08, Joshua Root <j...@macports.org> wrote: >> Fixed in master: >> <https://github.com/macports/macports-base/commit/6c8c70b370753b9015400b27afdcd303b7a0cb63> > I understand that there's no additional name field for subports in the > registry and that they have the same hash. But I don't get how the additional > checking you introduced would prevent this from happening (I cannot speak the > details of tcl though). Neither I understand how only portfiles of these 15 > out of ~130 ports that have subports/are subports were left in the registry. > Only thing that widly comes to mind — I haven't modified their portfiles > locally, but AFAIR of dependents on these while interrupting vim's editing > process, but again that would have meant leaving orphaned dirs for other > ports too.
Can I delete those rows safely?
