Just tried out the latest build and the working set dialog is much better,
thanks

Andy


On 6 October 2013 02:18, Igor Fedorenko <i...@ifedorenko.com> wrote:

> Heh. This is the first time I hear someone uses working sets as working
> sets.
>
> All people I talked to before use working sets as a workaround for
> lack of proper multimodule project support. It was certainly annoying
> following the same 5+ steps process needed to create and select new
> working set each time I imported a project. The updated wizard is
> definite improvement for my workflow.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't see a good way to automatically and conveniently
> group modules of the same aggregator and to allow flexible
> working set selection during import. Any suggestions anybody?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
>
> On 2013-10-02 6:40 PM, Andrew Holland wrote:
>
>> I tend to have a lot of single maven projects, these are normally
>> grouped under plugins or utils working sets, for multi-module projects
>> these are generally in there own working sets.
>>
>> how about having radio buttons (generate working set/choose working
>> set), this could grey out the old select dialog that was there previously?
>>
>>
>> On 2 October 2013 23:12, Igor Fedorenko <i...@ifedorenko.com
>> <mailto:i...@ifedorenko.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     How often do you import multi-module projects into existing working
>> set?
>>     Can you describe your workflow that leads into this?
>>
>>     --
>>     Regards,
>>     Igor
>>
>>
>>     On 2013-10-02 5:53 PM, Andrew Holland wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Fred,
>>
>>         i liked the old way to choose an existing working set, wouldn't
>>         it be
>>         better to have the old drop down with a button to create a new
>>         working set?
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 30 September 2013 15:33, Fred Bricon <fbri...@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:fbri...@gmail.com>
>>         <mailto:fbri...@gmail.com <mailto:fbri...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>              Hi,
>>
>>              we've made some drastic changes in the way the "Import Maven
>>              projects" workflow in m2e 1.5.0 [1]. Previously, when
>>         selecting a
>>              directory of projects to import, m2e spent a huge amount of
>>         time
>>              analyzing potential lifecycle mapping errors and discover
>>         potential
>>              fixes from remote connectors, before you could even choose
>>         which
>>              specific projects to import.
>>
>>              That lifecycle mapping analysis has been deferred to *after*
>>              projects are imported and it only checks for *actual*
>>         errors now,
>>              before trying to discover the world. The discovery
>>         mechanism itself
>>              has also been greatly optimized.
>>
>>              It means the 1st page of the maven import wizard can now
>>         refresh in
>>              less than a couple second (usually << 1s), instead of up to
>>         several
>>              minutes.
>>              One caveat is it won't try to discover connectors that for
>>         plugins
>>              whose lifecycle is already covered. ex: the mavenarchiver
>>         plugin
>>              won't be proposed for download if the maven-jar-plugin has
>>         no errors.
>>
>>              The lifecycle mapping discovery refactoring led to a few
>>         internal
>>              classes to be deleted or changed in a non backward
>>         compatible way,
>>              so if you built some m2e extensions over these, you might
>>         be badly
>>              affected. Check [2] to see the extent of the changes.
>>
>>              So, please, give the latest dev build a try [3] and let's
>>         know how
>>              good or bad the changes are from your perspective.
>>
>>              [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/__show_bug.cgi?id=409732
>>         <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=409732>
>>              [2]
>>         http://git.eclipse.org/c/m2e/__m2e-core.git/commit/?id=__
>> 798db4c8b2405f58319a5bb899b7ba__da7f8152b4
>>         <http://git.eclipse.org/c/m2e/m2e-core.git/commit/?id=
>> 798db4c8b2405f58319a5bb899b7bada7f8152b4>
>>              [3]
>>         http://nexus.tesla.io:8081/__nexus/content/sites/m2e.__
>> extras/m2e/1.5.0/N/LATEST/
>>
>>         <http://nexus.tesla.io:8081/nexus/content/sites/m2e.
>> extras/m2e/1.5.0/N/LATEST/>
>>
>>              Fred
>>
>>              --
>>              "Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd
>>
>>              _________________________________________________
>>
>>              m2e-users mailing list
>>         m2e-users@eclipse.org <mailto:m2e-users@eclipse.org>
>>         <mailto:m2e-users@eclipse.org <mailto:m2e-users@eclipse.org>>
>>         https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>>         <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _________________________________________________
>>
>>         m2e-users mailing list
>>         m2e-users@eclipse.org <mailto:m2e-users@eclipse.org>
>>         https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>>         <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>>
>>     _________________________________________________
>>
>>     m2e-users mailing list
>>     m2e-users@eclipse.org <mailto:m2e-users@eclipse.org>
>>     https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>>
>>     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m2e-users mailing list
>> m2e-users@eclipse.org
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> m2e-users mailing list
> m2e-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>
_______________________________________________
m2e-users mailing list
m2e-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users

Reply via email to