I tend to have a lot of single maven projects, these are normally grouped
under plugins or utils working sets, for multi-module projects these are
generally in there own working sets.

how about having radio buttons (generate working set/choose working set),
this could grey out the old select dialog that was there previously?


On 2 October 2013 23:12, Igor Fedorenko <i...@ifedorenko.com> wrote:

> How often do you import multi-module projects into existing working set?
> Can you describe your workflow that leads into this?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
>
> On 2013-10-02 5:53 PM, Andrew Holland wrote:
>
>> Hi Fred,
>>
>> i liked the old way to choose an existing working set, wouldn't it be
>> better to have the old drop down with a button to create a new working
>> set?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 September 2013 15:33, Fred Bricon <fbri...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:fbri...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     we've made some drastic changes in the way the "Import Maven
>>     projects" workflow in m2e 1.5.0 [1]. Previously, when selecting a
>>     directory of projects to import, m2e spent a huge amount of time
>>     analyzing potential lifecycle mapping errors and discover potential
>>     fixes from remote connectors, before you could even choose which
>>     specific projects to import.
>>
>>     That lifecycle mapping analysis has been deferred to *after*
>>     projects are imported and it only checks for *actual* errors now,
>>     before trying to discover the world. The discovery mechanism itself
>>     has also been greatly optimized.
>>
>>     It means the 1st page of the maven import wizard can now refresh in
>>     less than a couple second (usually << 1s), instead of up to several
>>     minutes.
>>     One caveat is it won't try to discover connectors that for plugins
>>     whose lifecycle is already covered. ex: the mavenarchiver plugin
>>     won't be proposed for download if the maven-jar-plugin has no errors.
>>
>>     The lifecycle mapping discovery refactoring led to a few internal
>>     classes to be deleted or changed in a non backward compatible way,
>>     so if you built some m2e extensions over these, you might be badly
>>     affected. Check [2] to see the extent of the changes.
>>
>>     So, please, give the latest dev build a try [3] and let's know how
>>     good or bad the changes are from your perspective.
>>
>>     [1] 
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/**show_bug.cgi?id=409732<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=409732>
>>     [2]
>>     http://git.eclipse.org/c/m2e/**m2e-core.git/commit/?id=**
>> 798db4c8b2405f58319a5bb899b7ba**da7f8152b4<http://git.eclipse.org/c/m2e/m2e-core.git/commit/?id=798db4c8b2405f58319a5bb899b7bada7f8152b4>
>>     [3]
>>     http://nexus.tesla.io:8081/**nexus/content/sites/m2e.**
>> extras/m2e/1.5.0/N/LATEST/<http://nexus.tesla.io:8081/nexus/content/sites/m2e.extras/m2e/1.5.0/N/LATEST/>
>>
>>     Fred
>>
>>     --
>>     "Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd
>>
>>     ______________________________**_________________
>>     m2e-users mailing list
>>     m2e-users@eclipse.org <mailto:m2e-users@eclipse.org>
>>     
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/m2e-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> m2e-users mailing list
>> m2e-users@eclipse.org
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/m2e-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
> m2e-users mailing list
> m2e-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/m2e-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>
_______________________________________________
m2e-users mailing list
m2e-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users

Reply via email to