That sounds like a nice workflow. This ought to be in a FAQ of tips and
hints for people new to the M100.

I might just try it out. I'm pretty rigorous about using *SAVE
"COM:98N1ENN"*, but I have to tell my Unix box to receive the file each
time (cp /dev/ttyUSB0 foo.do). And every copy I save overwrites the
previous one, unlike the natural history you'll have in your log file if
you find you need to go back a few revisions.

One question though: why do you send at 9600 bps? I thought all Model T's
could do 19,200bps.

—b9

On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 10:26 AM MikeS <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Will,
>
> Too many times I've made some changes and either accidentally deleted the
> file or messed it up so badly that I want to revert to the previous
> version, so I've learned the hard way that it's a good idea to save the
> work before making major changes.
>
> One way is to SAVE it locally on the M100 as a .DO file ("Foo.do" or
> "Foo",A) , changing the name as appropriate; note that BASIC will save a
> file as .BA by default but will LOAD a .DO file without specifying the
> '.DO' or ',A' if no .BA file with the same file exists. Of course if it's a
> very large file you may not have room for both the .BA and .DO files in RAM
> at the same time.
>
> What I do if I'm close enough to a PC to easily connect or stay connected
> is to open a file (e.g. "backup.txt") on the PC for ASCII text download
> with a terminal program and just leave it open.
>
> On the M100 I've programmed F7 to 'Key 7, "COM:88N1E"', so when I want to
> save the file I'm working on I press F3 to save, F7 in response to 'Save "'
> and Return. It's a good idea to embed a version no. in the program and
> update it every time.
>
> This concatenates all the saved files in one file; if you actually need to
> go back then you'd have to stop the transfer, edit the file on the PC and
> send it back to the M100. Of course you can open a new file on the PC every
> time if you don't mind typing on the PC every time.
>
> To Load a .DO file from the PC, open TEXT, enter the File name, LOAD (F2)
> and enter 'COM:88N1E' in response to 'Load from:'; on the PC terminal
> program select Upload ASCII or whatever it's called and the file name
> (which does not have to be the same as on the M100). You may not see
> anything happening but the terminal program should indicate somehow when
> the transfer is finished. Type a CTL-Z on the PC and the file should appear
> on the M100; switch to BASIC and Load it, and Bob's your mother's brother.
>
> This is mainly meant for folks who want to or have to just use the M100's
> built-in functions, and to show how to avoid overruns when Loading BASIC
> .DO programs as in a previous post here a few days ago.
>
> Teeny, TS-DOS etc. certainly are very useful and in fact necessary if
> you're working with .BA tokenized files or Machine language code.
>
> Other than my phone I'm not an Apple kind of guy, so I can't give any
> Mac-specific hints.
>
> One other hint: to simplify switching from RUN to EDIT mode I've
> programmed 'F6,"Edit"+chr$(13)'
>
> Not too verbose, I hope...
>
> m
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Will Senn <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2022 10:16 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [M100] Notoriously S.L.O.W BASIC posted - help speeding it
> up appreciated
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm curious about the COM stuff. In a later note you said:
>
> It's actually sorta been fun programming on the 'real' M100; I left a
> download running on the PC and every time I wanted to backup an interim
> version just in case, I just pressed F3 and F7 (which I'd programmed with
> the COM stats).
>
> and here, you say stuff about programming the function keys with
> "COM:88N1E"...
>
> It would be nice to be able to transfer / save from BASIC and/or my
> terminal on the Mac without the overhead of dl/TEENY.CO. I know enough to
> be dangerous and that the keys can easily be programmed to effectively type
> stuff. I'm just not clear on is how this works mechanically. Are you in
> BASIC, typing away, having just fixed some bit and are ready to SAVE it
> remotely, so you press F3 and voila, it just does it, or do you press F3
> and then do something to get it transferring, or what?
>
> I have the cables hooked up and usually, I:
> 1. SAVE from BASIC to .DO or .BA
> 2. Start up DL on the Mac side, if it isn't already running in my ~/m100
> directory
> 3. Press F8 to get menu
> 4. Select TEENY.CO
> 5. Type S HEXIT .DO
> 6. Watch it complete without error (so long as HEXIT.DO doesn't already
> exist, I think)
>
> What I'm imagining happen is:
> 1. SAVE from BASIC to .DO or .BA
> 2. Press F3
> 3. Magically a file is sent and received on the Mac (where does it's name
> come from?)
> 4. Celebration
> or
> 1. F2 from BASIC
> 2. Start sending a file (how?) from the Mac
> 3. Celebration
>
> Just curious!
>
> Will
>
>
> On 10/28/22 12:30 PM, MikeS wrote:
>
> 
> Yeah, that's a setup I used for a while, sort of a poor man's
> tablet/clamshell 'convertible. ;-) No problem extending the cable to around
> 2 feet.
>
> Never did use the disk drives very much although I did install a second
> one; even today while playing with Will's dump program it's so simple to
> plug in the cable to the PC, select download or upload on the PC and either
> BASIC F3 (SAVE) to com: or TEXT F2 (LOAD) from com:, not to mention being
> able to print on the PC and send/receive over the Internet.
>
> Question for the experts: I have "COM:88N1E" stored in one of the BASIC
> function keys; I don't suppose there's a way to do that for TEXT?
>
> Back in the day IIRC the DVI and the M100 were both around $800; probably
> still have the receipts somewhere; don't know what that'd be today..
>
> And yes, the Model T and NEC BASICs are remarkably versatile, especially
> considering the size constraints.
>
> Definitely unique and, I don't know, friendly in a way...
>
> m
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* B 9 <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 28, 2022 12:39 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [M100] Notoriously S.L.O.W BASIC posted - help speeding it
> up appreciated
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 8:51 AM MikeS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  It might not be so bad on a 200 but my main annoyance is having to
>> scroll up and down on the M100's 8 line screen; as a matter of fact the
>> larger screen was the main reason I bought a DVI when they came out.
>>
>
> When they came out? I wonder if they were more expensive when they were
> new or now that they are rare and "vintage". Is that a picture of your
> Disk/Video Interface setup? Looks nifty!
>
>
>>  For a lot of stuff in the old days I actually used GWBASIC or TBASIC to
>> program on a PC; except for screen printing and graphics they're almost
>> completely compatible and with a few conditional lines many programs could
>> be run and tested on both the PC and the M100.
>>
>
> There's something I didn't know! I've been surprised at how capable the
> Model T's 8-bit BASIC is. Was it the last one Microsoft made? Given what I
> had expected after seeing the Apple ][ and C64, it's quite a bit more
> advanced. (For example, ON COM GOSUB). And I read that the NEC 8201A
> version of the DVI allowed not only color graphics, but extended the BASIC
> language with graphics commands that I think may be from GW-BASIC.
>
>
>>  I can understand that some folks want to relive the total experience of
>> doing everything on the old hardware [...]
>>
>
> Sure, and there's nothing wrong with reliving the past. But, that's not
> me. I didn't get to experience the M100 when it was current. This is my
> first time around with this technology, so part of the fun is trying to see
> what it was like back then. I know, it's sort of like people who go camping
> for a week to get in touch with their primitive hunter-gatherer ancestors.
> Not likely to be terribly accurate, but still, it's fun.
>
>
>> Nevertheless, for just noodling around while relaxing on the couch not
>> much can beat the M100.
>>
>
> I'm beginning to learn that! I still haven't got a true Model 100. I only
> have a Tandy 200 because my neighbor was throwing it away and wondered if I
> could use "an old laptop".  I had no idea what it was. But, given my
> experiences so far, maybe I should look into getting the real thing some
> day.
>
> —b9
>
>
>

Reply via email to