Alrighty, no matter how the final decision goes, I'll be excited to embrace the 2.1 version.
Alternatively, I guess the solution can't be as easy as providing a catch-bibtex-error switch in the preferences setting. :P Xuchen On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org> wrote: > 2014-04-08 16:54 GMT+02:00 Xuchen Yao <yaoxuc...@gmail.com>: > > Thanks! Then why didn't the same error show up on the first machine with >> also LyX2.1rc but TexLive 2010? >> > > I don't know. > > >> I'm actually leaning against fixing this duplicate entry problem from the >> source file: in scientific collaboration it is often that co-authors have >> duplicate entries from their own bib files. Merging them was so much easier >> prior to Lyx 2.1 >> > > We tried to address a long-standing request that we should catch BibTeX > errors. Since these went unnoticed, people could end up with erroneous > documents. Now we only can catch all or no BibTeX errors, so the price for > comprehensive error reporting is more pedantism. > > We currently still discuss if this feature will make it into 2.1 final. > However, there are only two options at this point: Provide BibTeX error > reporting with the price that people will need to fix errors they didn't > even notice before or drop the feature completly. > > Jürgen > > >> >> Xuchen >> > >
