Ray Rashif wrote:
> OK so it's like this:
>
> <example>
> Those using LaTeX are more productive than their traditional counterparts.¹
>
> ---
> ¹ John, 1999
>
> ...
>
> References
> -----------------
> John, D. (1999). Proceedings of the ...
> </example>
>
> If so, I've seen this in quite a few organisational publications, though
> they use per-chapter bibliography.
Well, sure, this is completely common in the humanities. This is the usual
author-year ("harvard") style which you can produce with natbib, jurabib or
biblatex. I do not understand what should be so special about it.
Jürgen
