Liviu Andronic wrote:
> If this were implemented, do you think that it would flexible enough
> to support less TeX-ish custom insets such as the one described here
> [1]? To sum up, I would like to come up with an "Sweave chunk" custom
> inset that
> - would be similar to ERT boxes
> - would wrap the contents of the inset within "<<>>=" and "@"
> - if an options, "Short Title"-like inset is inserted, its contents
> would be inserted between "<<" and ">>=" from above
>
> Please let me know what you think of such a construct. Regards
> Liviu
I think with the layout changes I described, this could be implemented easily.
For instance
Argument
Type optional
LabelString "Sweave Chunk"
StartDelim "<<"
EndDelim ">>="
PassThru 1
Order 1
EndArgument
where StarDelim and EndDelim would be optional (defaulting to "["/"]" for
optional and to "{"/"}" for mandatory arguments.
With this extension, we could also support Beamer's <overlay> arguments
natively.
Jürgen
