On 2010-03-22, Walter van Holst wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada <ques...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>> 7. the rest of the world operates on rich text/html. LyX doesn't >> (clipboard integration is poor, copy-pasting from/to web loses >> formatting) > Actuall, I prefer the current default of losing formatting. The whole > point of LyX is that you focus on structure and content and have LaTeX > take > care of formatting. The rest of the world operates on a fundamentally > braindead paradigm and if I wanted to use that paradigm I'd be a happy OOo > camper. Which I am not. Sorry, but HTML has (or can be used for) a semantic markup in a quite comparable way. So, keeping sections, links, emphasized text, quotes, ... *as an option* would be an enhancement. Günter
