I haven't found a way to do it using Covington numbering, which is
what I usually use. You can either have all examples numbered as
sub-examples and not have a group heading for them, or just use crude
manual numbering for your (a) and (b) sub-examples and use automatic
labeling and cross-referencing for the main example.
Maria
2010/2/23 Petr Šimon <petr.si...@gmail.com>:
> 2010/2/23 Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org>:
>> Petr Šimon wrote:
>>> I have in mind something like this:
>>> \begin{example} \label{1}
>>> \begin{enumerate}
>>> \item a \label{1a}
>>> \item b label{1b}
>>>
>>> So that I can refer to all the subexamples by 1 and to each
>>> individually, 1a and 1b.
>>> I would hope that when I add a subexample a group label would be inserted.
>>> Is this possible from the layout definitions? I tried to look at it
>>> briefly, but it wasn't clear to me how that would be possible.
>>
>> No. You will need to use ERT.
>>
>> Jürgen
>>
>
> Ok, thanks.
> Perhaps it could be added later? Right now the subexamples make little
> sense when they can't be referred to as a group.
> Petr
>
