Steve Litt wrote: > You know what? If LyX is going to be so tightly bound to minor versions of > Qt, then someone should document a chart of Qt versions and their possible > LyX versions, and LyX versions and their possible Qt versions. > > Also, I'd like to once again recommend that the developers develop each LyX > version to be compatible with a wider range of Qt.
Normally, this should be the case. However, Qt 4.4 revealed problems that were simply not foreseeable, unless Qt 4.4 -- well -- existed. Jürgen
