Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Rich Shepard wrote:
Don't have either, but will grab them from CTAN.
Paul,
Both textcompsym.sty and textcompfix.sty come from the Georgia Tech
thesis
collection. The latter makes no difference in the error message; the former
generates a whole bunch of different LaTeX errors. Sigh.
Thanks,
Rich
After reading the preambles, I would expect vice versa. The textcompsym
package fakes a number of missing symbols but apparently not
textservicemark (so I would expect the original error to repeat); the
textcompfix package supposedly switches the font to Computer Modern long
enough to print the service mark, then back to the previous font, so
that should handle textservicemark (don't know about creating any new
errors).
Looks like the "error" message that you got in the first place was
actually just a warning that textcomp was substituting another font
(cmr, I think) in order to print the service mark. Try exporting your
original doc to a LaTeX file and run latex (or pdflatex) against it. I
did that on a small test doc, got your error message, just hit enter to
run through it, and the latex run finished and gave me what looks like a
correct DVI file. Methinks perhaps LyX just can't tell the difference
between a warning and a fatal error. (In fairness, latex does ask for
input at that point, so maybe it's latex that doesn't distinguish
warnings from errors.)
If that's too aggravating (and assuming you're ok with the service mark
being in Computer Modern), you might hack the textcomp.sty package and
delete the warning part from the definition of [EMAIL PROTECTED] (so that it
just does the \bgroup ... \egroup stuff).
/Paul
