On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:38:57 -0500 Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 February 2008 02:01, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > Steve Litt wrote: > > > > Interestingly, it appears that in order to upgrade to qt 2.2.3, I would > > > need to upgrade my glibc (because of rtld(GNU_HASH)). I'm sorry, but > > > that's just too much to expect from a user. > > > > No offense intended Steve but you are obviously confused with version > > numbers etc. > > Of course offense was intended. A typo, or even a series of like typos, does > not confusion make. > > > I even suspect that you didn't even fully read the README > > and INSTALL that come with the source. > > Quite a leap of logic. > > > As an end-user, either you wait > > for your distro to come with a binary package or you do the required > > step by step things you need to do in order to compile LyX. > > That's exactly my point. When the step by step implies messing with the very > vitals of your 1.5 year old OS, there's something very wrong with the step by > step. > In that case you need the 1.5 year old Lyx to match your 1.5 year old distro, don't you? > > Many users > > compile LyX without problems. > > That's relevent why? > > SteveT > > Steve Litt > Books written in LyX: > Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist > Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting > Troubleshooting: Just the Facts >
