Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > In the meantime, you might > > try 1.5.1: I believe that version is unaffected (but I'm not sure). > > Indeed, 1.5.1 is not affected. But I'd prefer that you provide a new > 1.5.2 package (same thing for Windows packagers).
Me, too. Note that 1.5.1 is far less stable than 1.5.2 (in terms of crashing). Jürgen
