Rudi Gaelzer wrote: > Well, OK, thanks anyway, but this is Lamport-style, standard LaTeX. One > of the aims of the AMS package, though, is to provide resources that > render mathematical display that is aesthetically more appealing than > standard LaTeX...
And it offers a lot of useful tools. > Just for you to notice the difference between array and subarray > environments in this case, I'm attaching a small .tex file which compares > both instances. And I attach the same file converted to LyX with tex2lyx. > On Friday 11 November 2005 18:04, Helge Hafting wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 05:33:39PM -0200, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: >> > Does anyone know if the subarray AMS environment is implemented in LyX >> > (I mean, not in ERT mode) and how to use it? It is "semi-supported": It has no GUI entry, and you can't distinguish it optically in LyX from a normal array, but you can create a 1x1 subarray if you enter \subarray <space> in math mode. You can then add columns and rows or change alignment with the usual tabular commands. Every AMS construct I know of is at least supported like subarray. Georg
test_subscript-t2l-221.lyx
Description: application/lyx
