Ingar Pareliussen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits increase the amount > of work for the translators as well. Different toolsets have different ways > to specify shortcuts and each have to be translated manually.
Good point. > > So as a translator I would like to have only one toolset to work with, and if > I could have chosen I would loved a kde-frontend. There is so many things we > could have gotten for free if we would made the plunge to kde instead of qt. > (on the fly spell check, kio-slaves to name two from the top of my head). And > offcourse as kde4 is going to be ported to win32 and osx it could be used on > those architectures as well. ;) (packing work still remains, though) I could also say: gnome, gnome-vfs, internationalization (I18N), localization (L10N), OS X is there, cairo back-end, win32, and lgpl license, i.e. not depending on trolltech... > However, I can see why it is not going to happen as it would mean ripping out > parts of lyx`s tookit independent parts and replacing them with kdelibs. So I > am happy with the status quo. This I cannot comment, i.e. what is the work of tailoring the present api to new layer. Sincerely, Gour -- Registered Linux User | #278493 GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
