On 10/19/05, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> PS: Please always reply to the list > > > > I second that. I noticed a tendency to reply off-list. This leaves > > gaps in the mailing list archives and puts off a subset of list > > subscribers. css-discuss, on the contrary, adopted some different > > habits. The main question to ask is "would the group or the World > > Wide Web benefit from this response or is its scope too narrow?". For > > the latter, in the case of Web site critique, there needn't be a > > public message available as it is site-specific or refers to browser > > bugs that are soon to vanish. > > Maybe it's just my mail client, but this list seems to default for a > reply to the sender instead of to the list, unlike all the other lists > I've ever been on. I accidently sent a reply intended for the list to > the sender and didn't realise until a few days later. So maybe other > people have the same problem.
I agree, Paul. The reply address should be occupied by the list's address. Paul
