Angus Leeming writes:
> I think that I'd use ERT. See attached.

I looked at this and it works fine, but I don't see it as being very 
practical as there are dozens and more of such references.

Another pitfall I see is that many of the footnotes are truly citations 
and some even repeat; therefore it would be very desireable to treat 
these as citations, but which are placed in the footnotes.

I see that I can add citations to footnotes, which might work for some 
projects...

---------------------------------
¹[Pfeiffer2001]                          <---- citation
²And here is just a plain footnote.

...but here, again, I want the full citation as it would be listed in the 
References.

-K
-- 
Kevin Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tiros-Translations

Reply via email to