Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > >> Can you make sure that the cygwin sed is used? I don't think it has >> any such problems. > > Indeed, Paul says that cygwin packages gnu sed 4.07 and that all is Ok > with this. > > So the answer to your Win32 problems is clear: use a 'decent' sed. > Perhaps one of you might contact Ruurd and get him to replace the sed > that he distributes with something functional. > Does anyone know of a Win32 port of sed 4.0.7 that Ruurd could use? -- Paul