Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> 
>> Can you make sure that the cygwin sed is used? I don't think it has
>> any such problems.
> 
> Indeed, Paul says that cygwin packages gnu sed 4.07 and that all is Ok 
> with this.
> 
> So the answer to your Win32 problems is clear: use a 'decent' sed. 
> Perhaps one of you might contact Ruurd and get him to replace the sed 
> that he distributes with something functional.
> 

Does anyone know of a Win32 port of sed 4.0.7 that Ruurd could use?

-- Paul

Reply via email to